Greta - Movie Review by Monte Yazzie

Greta.png

Greta

 

Director: Neil Jordan

Starring: Chloë Grace Moretz, Isabelle Huppert, Maika Monroe, Zawe Ashton, and Colm Feore

 

“No act of kindness, however small, is ever wasted,” an excerpt from an Aesop fable.

 

Aesop’s words and fables have illustrated numerous, valuable life lessons humanity can still learn from today. Though, considering just how terrible humanity can be to one another, it’s easy to remember moments in life when you may have been too nice to someone else, and had that act of kindness taken advantage of.

 

Director Neil Jordan crafts his own wicked fable with the film “Greta,” a story that deals with aspects of obsession and compulsion conveyed upon a young woman played by, Chloë Grace Moretz, who was trying to simply live by Aesop’s rule of kindness.

 

The unhinged predator in pursuit is none other than Academy Award winning actress Isabelle Huppert doing her best “big bad wolf” performance.

 

Frances (Chloë Grace Moretz) is a small town girl living in the big city, working as a waitress in a fine dining restaurant. She lives in a modern style loft with her best friend Erica (Maika Monroe), wandering around the city with wide eyed amusement, and travels on the subway to get to work.

 

Frances is clearly trying to separate herself from the past but is doing her best to live a happy life in the present. On a trip home on the subway Frances finds a purse left behind, she searches it and finds an address that leads her to a lonely older woman named Greta (Isabelle Huppert).

 

Frances develops a connection with Greta, they play the piano and look at dogs to adopt, and the two quickly become friends. But Greta has a secret and when Frances discovers it their relationship quickly changes.

 

Stories of obsession are common in cinema; whether a young man’s obsession with his dead mother from “Psycho,” or a woman’s obsession with a married man in “Fatal Attraction,” or a deranged Hobbit’s obsession with a golden ring in “Lord of the Rings.”

 

Obsession can make for intriguing tales that display the lengths that humanity will go to capture the person, place or thing they value so greatly.

 

“Greta” at its narrative core is composed around the aspect of obsession, turning a story that straddles the line between being a cat-and-mouse thriller and a straight up survival horror film.

 

It’s unfortunate that the film never makes a clear choice of what it wants to be, but instead fumbles about with some great actors doing their best with a story that never builds the tension or fear that it is trying to achieve.

 

While the setup functions nicely to introduce the two characters together, with Moretz and Huppert creating some good chemistry with each other, once the deception is revealed the film falls into familiar territory.

 

At one moment the film feels like it may swerve in another direction, which would make sense considering director Neil Jordan’s ability to turn strange circumstances into intriguing character studies. But instead it continues on its one-dimensional path.

 

Moretz is a great actress who unfortunately isn’t utilized completely here, just like in other recent films, with ineffective ways that display her raw and emotional talent.

 

Huppert keeps the film afloat with her sly smile and unhinged outbursts, but even her character at times feels pulled from a different story completely.

 

The character Greta seems rich with a backstory that is never used to build more complexity into why she is doing such terrible things. “Greta” boasts a capable cast, a good director and an intriguing setup, each of which is completely underutilized in this by-the-numbers thriller.

 

 

Monte’s Rating

2.00 out of 5.00

To Dust - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

To Dust.jpg

‘To Dust’ is not an old, tired story, but it is a strange one

 

Directed by:  Shawn Snyder

Written by:  Shawn Snyder and Jason Begue

Starring:  Geza Rohrig and Matthew Broderick

 

“To Dust” – “I have questions.” – Shmuel (Geza Rohrig)

 

“This is all kinds of wrong.” – Albert (Matthew Broderick)

 

After watching Shawn Snyder’s strange indie “To Dust”, one might walk out of the theatre having questions and proclaiming that this movie is all kinds of wrong.  Sure, the premise is bizarre and off-putting, but admittedly, it does cover ground about a never-talked about subject:  a loved one’s body decomposing after the burial.

 

Shmuel morns the loss of his wife.  She dies from cancer, and not only has her passing ripped a hole in Shmuel’s life, but he obsesses over her decaying corpse which lays under six feet of soil. 

 

When will she find peace?  When will she turn to dust and become one with the earth?  How long will it take?  Weeks?  Months?  Ew.

 

Surely, Shmuel’s boys Naftali (Sammy Voit) and Noam (Leo Heller) could use some earthly advice from their dad, but not until he finds peace too.   With Shmuel finding no solace from religion, he turns to science and drives to New Hempstead Community College for answers.  He arrives in a classroom unannounced and surprises Albert, an apathetic biology professor.   After answering a few random questions about rotting corpses, Albert believes that Shmuel will go on his “merry” way, but the two – instead - become joined at the hip due to this particular widower’s relentless quest for emotional rest.

 

Shmuel and Albert somehow form an amusing odd couple under the most morbid of conditions, as the film attempts to create levity from despair, and mainly through Broderick’s gifted comedic timing.  Many times, Albert pokes fun at Shmuel’s odd requests, but also at the man himself.

 

Even though Shmuel’s thoughts about his wife’s body might be his natural outlet in the grieving process, this abnormal fixation provides ripe material for outsider sarcasm, and his physical appearance becomes an unmeasured portion of the comedy equation.  Shmuel is a Hasidic Jewish man, and in some recent movies like “Menashe” (2017) and “Disobedience” (2018), this religious community is self-contained within the narratives.  Here, Shmuel’s travels around the semi-rural suburbs of New York draw comments and looks from those not familiar with a shtreimel or a payot, and Snyder and co-writer Jason Begue do not shy away from these awkward moments. 

 

Meanwhile, Rohrig plays his character straighter than a hypotenuse during a geometry final exam, as Shmuel internalizes the subtle digs and stares, but he pushes forward – undeterred - to solve this after-death riddle.  Frustration, despair, naivete, and sorrow are his most trusty emotions, and silence is his closest friend.  He does, however, find – literally, in some cases – a partner in crime with Albert. 

 

Broderick’s Albert might be channeling shades of high school teacher Jim McAllister from “Election” (1999), and in fact, both educators could be the same person.  Hey, it’s 20 years removed from Mr. McAllister’s ouster from a Nebraska high school, and perhaps he changed his name, developed an active marijuana habit and lost his enthusiasm for teaching. 

 

Well, this step into Albert’s and Shmuel’s on-screen realities will not make a whole lot of sense or feel like the right ingredients for a wildly appealing movie, but “To Dust” does offer a unique experience, especially if a movie-concoction of religious humor, rotting corpses and shady deeds is your jam.   

(2.5/4 stars)    

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

 

Fighting with My Family - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

Fighting with my Family.jpg

Don’t fight it.  ‘Fighting with My Family’ is a good movie.

 

Written and Directed by:  Stephen Merchant

Starring:  Florence Pugh, Dwayne Johnson, Nick Frost, Lena Headey, Jack Lowden, and Vince Vaughn

 

“Fighting with My Family” – Some people want to be rock ‘n’ roll singers, and others hope to be cowboys.  For proof, just look back at Bon Scott’s wish in AC/DC’s “Rock ‘n’ Roll Singer” (1975) and Boys Don’t Cry’s declaration in “I Wanna Be a Cowboy” (1986).  Other folks dream of becoming ballerinas, center fielders, quarterbacks, teachers, doctors, or astronauts. 

 

For Saraya-Jade Bevis (Florence Pugh), she wants to be a WWE wrestler.  Actually, her dad Ricky (Nick Frost), mom Julia (Lena Headey) and brother Zak (Jack Lowden) all have the same dream.  They are a wrestling family who manage, work and brawl in the ring for their own local promotion, the World Association of Wrestling in Norwich, England.  Hence, writer/director Stephen Merchant’s film title “Fighting with My Family” makes perfect sense.  Now, the family doesn’t really fight, because pro wrestling is scripted entertainment, but the bumps and bruises are real.

 

Actually, Saraya’s journey is a real-life one, and Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson wanted to bring her story to the big screen. 

 

“I know that family, a crazy, loving (and) at times dysfunctional family.  That was my family growing up,” Johnson said in a recent interview. 

 

Merchant also could relate to Saraya’s experiences. 

 

“This is a working-class family who just had these dreams and these desires, and particularly (the) kids’ to go on and enter the world of entertainment and shoot for the stars.  That’s something that I responded to very much,” Merchant added.

 

Even though the film is packaged with familiar underdog themes, it is easy to respond positively to “Fighting with My Family”, whether you are a wrestling fan or not.  Although, admittedly, pro wrestling fans will better relate to the material. 

 

These four wrestlers are perfectly happy in Norwich, as they produce (and perform in) their shows and clinics, but when the WWE has a tryout in London, Saraya and Zak figuratively and literally jump at the chance.   Saraya, who also goes by wrestling names Britani and Paige, punches her ticket to the WWE training center in Orlando to hopefully make the minor league circuit.  Far from home, this stranger feels out of place in this strange land of sunshine, pristine corporate offices and blonde-haired beauties. 

 

She has to find her way.

 

The film easily finds ways to engage the audience, and it starts with Pugh’s convincing performance.  Pugh said that they only had a limited time to work out their wrestling moves, but this actress flips, spins, punches, and kicks like she’s grappled in the squared circle for years.  She also has the acting chops to pull emotional strings with a new sibling conflict that emerges, and Lowden successfully carries the other half of this unfortunate struggle. 

 

Keep in mind, with all this talk of fighting, punching, brooding, and toiling, Merchant’s picture is also quite funny, which, of course, captures the spirit of pro wrestling, and Frost, Johnson, and Vince Vaughn – who plays Saraya’s/Britani’s/Paige’s WWE coach Hutch – openly lend their comedic talents.   Although, be warned, Vaughn is dramatically-less frat boy and much more drill sergeant, when whipping the wrestlers into shape. 

 

At times, “Fighting with My Family” feels like one long WWE commercial, because the logos, references, toys, posters, and arena events regularly appear on-screen, so the theatre experience doubles as a product-placement nirvana.  Then again, Saraya lived through these events, so buying into (pardon the pun) the marketing - rather than fighting it - allows one to embrace the film, and the performances and story are strong enough to deliver magical goosebump-moments.  “Fighting with My Family” is surprisingly emotional, and Saraya – who is always referred to as Paige these days – was speechless when Johnson wanted to make a movie about her. 

 

“I was crying my eyes out,” Paige said.  

 

Sounds like someone’s dreams came true.

(3/4 stars)

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

 

How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

How to Train Your Dragon.jpg

How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World

 

Directed by Dean DeBlois

Written by Dean DeBlois based on “How to Train Your Dragon” by Cressida Cowell

Featuring the voices of: Jay Baruchel, America Ferrera, Cate Blanchett, Craig Ferguson, F. Murray Abraham, Gerard Butler, Jonah Hill, Christopher Mintz-Plasse, Kit Harrington

 

As I’ve gotten older, my desire to experience animated films has only grown. I like the stories they tell, the characters that they offer. There’s a sense of, freedom, of really expression in a blank computer screen.

There is an exception to that rule, and unfortunately, it is a sequel or a trilogy. And it happened to DreamWorks’ third entry in their fantastically successful “How to Train Your Dragon” series, which concludes with the third film, “The Hidden World,” now playing in theaters.

We’ve seen series of animated films where studios have waited too long in between entries for audiences to want to catch up. I saw the first one, and I admittedly fell in love with Toothless, the dragon and Hiccup (Jay Baruchel), the future leader of Berk.

I never really let go of those characters either, but I did forget about their adventure, having missed the sequel, ironically titled “How to Train Your Dragon 2”. If it sounds like I am mocking the series, I really am not.

Oh, look! There was a television series too and it ran between 2012 and 2018.

Even though I love animation, and it sure is gorgeous in “The Hidden World,” looking nearly photo-real, I was awestruck at just how flat the characters had become. In fairness, I might have missed a beat or two over the past nine years. A lot has apparently happened.

But, you don’t need to have seen the television series or the second film to really pick up on what’s happening in this latest adventure. Some of the situations that are presented in “The Hidden World” might have made more sense, but the story’s framework, while serviceable, is something we’ve seen rehashed before.

What brings this film to life are the characters. I remembered Toothless and found Hiccup memorable. Dean DeBlois, who wrote and directed the second entry in this series is back and he brought a lot of heart to this film, especially in the courting aspects, which were represented exceptionally well through facial expressions and just a little bit of nudging.

F. Murray Abraham’s Grimmel is the villain in this story. The animators did an incredible job of capturing his the actor’s likeness and the seriousness at which is plots his nefarious ways was effective. It wasn’t until the third act, when the big extravaganza kicks in to full force that we really see him for the dangerous character that he is.

That’s really the challenge with the narrative arc. It certainly does complete Hiccup’s journey as well as Toothless’s. But for a “final entry,” even with as much heart, candor and romance in it, I don’t know that the story completely captures the essence of what’s driving it: the theme of letting go. It ties up loose ends, however the closure isn’t as clean as it could have been.

We so much want to be accepted for who we are. All of us. Hiccup does. Toothless does. Heck, even Grimmel does, but we don’t care about that because he’s just another token villain. Astrid (America Ferrera) is steadfast in her ways, and she is an exceptionally strong character as is Valka (Cate Blanchett.) Many of Hiccup’s friends and comrades are just as much fun.

The cast has a lot of fun in this story. It is light on its feet, and families will be drawn to it. John Powell’s light score is adventurous in spirit and fun in its emotions.

“How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World” is a fun, vivid film. The cast is strong, but the story wasn’t as effective a closure as it could have been. It will satisfy audiences and long-time fans of the series.

2.5 out of 4

Monte Yazzie's Oscar Predictions

Yazzie.jpg

Oscar season draws to a close this Sunday night when the 91st Annual Academy Awards finalize the cluster of, in my opinion, crazy nominations that have composed this year’s ballots. “Green Book”, “A Star Is Born”, and “Roma” have been the “best picture” talk of the season while films like “First Reformed”, “Burning”, “Blindspotting”, and “If Beale Street Could Talk” missed the top award nomination. There was controversy for cutting the nominations for two critical elements of the filmmaking process from televised recognition, enough people complained and they brought them back. There was controversy about the early announced host for the Oscars, enough people complained and the host has been eliminated from the show. It’s been a crazy season.

 

Since everything seems a little off kilter this year, I’ve decided to embrace it. Every year I’ll make two ballots for Oscar nominations, one list designated from my “head” and another ballot designated from my “heart”. It is much more difficult than it should be trying to figure out which film deserves recognition. So, here is a list detailing both of the choices for a few of the categories for the Academy Awards.

Favourite 2.jpg

Picture

“Roma” – The Head Pick
“A Star Is Born”
“BlacKkKlansman”
“Black Panther”
“Bohemian Rhapsody”

“The Favourite” – The Heart Pick
“Green Book”
“Vice”

  

Glenn Close.jpg

Actress

Glenn Close “The Wife” – The Head and The Heart Pick

Yalitza Aparicio “Roma”
Olivia Colman “The Favourite”
Lady Gaga “A Star Is Born”
Melissa McCarthy “Can You Ever Forgive Me”

 

Rami.jpg

Actor

Rami Malek “Bohemian Rhapsody” – The Head Pick
Christian Bale “Vice”

Bradley Cooper “A Star Is Born” – The Heart Pick
Willem Dafoe “At Eternity’s Gate”
Viggo Mortensen “Green Book”

 


Regina King.jpg

Supporting Actress

Regina King “If Beale Street Could Talk - The Head and The Heart Pick
Amy Adams “Vice”
Emma Stone “The Favourite”
Marina de Tavira “Roma”
Rachel Weisz “The Favourite”

 

Grant.jpg

Supporting Actor

Mahershala Ali “Green Book” - The Head Pick
Adam Driver “BlacKkKlansman"
Sam Elliott “A Star Is Born”

Richard E. Grant “Can You Ever Forgive Me?" - The Heart Pick
Sam Rockwell “Vice”

 

cuaron.jpg


Director

Alfonso Cuarón “Roma" - The Head and The Heart Pick

Yorgos Lanthimos “The Favourite”
Spike Lee "BlacKkKlansman”
Adam McKay “Vice”
Pawel Pawlikowski “Cold War”

 


RBG.jpg

Documentary

“RBG” - The Head Pick
“Free Solo”
“Hale County This Morning, This Evening”

“Minding the Gap” - The Heart Pick
“Of Fathers and Sons”

 

 

spidey.jpg

Animated Feature

“Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse” - The Head and The Heart Pick
“Incredibles 2”
“Isle of Dogs”
“Mirai”
“Ralph Breaks the Internet"


roma 2.jpg

 Foreign Language

“Roma” Mexico - The Head and The Heart Pick
“Capernaum” Lebanon
“Cold War” Poland
“Never Look Away” Germany
“Shoplifters” Japan

 

Blackkklansman 2.jpg

Film Editing

“Bohemian Rhapsody” – The Head Pick

“BlacKkKlansman” - The Heart Pick
“The Favourite”
“Green Book” 
“Vice”

 

Roma 3.jpg

Cinematography

“Roma” - The Head and The Heart Pick
“Cold War”
“The Favourite”
“Never Look Away”
“A Star Is Born”

Ben Cahlamer's Oscar Picks

Cahlamer.jpg

Ben Cahlamer Final Oscar Picks

 

One thing is for certain: the 91st Oscar season has been anything but an assured thing. From one PR nightmare to another, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (Academy) has pressed onward, and this Sunday, they announce the biggest winners of the season.

2018 was a magical year at the cinema. From a British period piece with vengeance on its mind to a live-in maid keeping an on-the-rocks family from falling apart, there has been no shortage of great cinema.

And no matter how hard the producers and studios campaigned for their respective films, yes, I am looking at you Netflix, my picks will ultimately have something in common with the actual winners: they will be completely chosen at random, because there’s absolutely no rhyme or reason to what’s happened this year.

Oh. Unlike the Academy, I have omitted certain categories because I did not see enough of the films for me to qualify a winner. Please note that this will not shorten your reading time in any way, shape, or form.  Thank you, ABC and, good night.

Favourite.jpg

Screenplay (Original): “The Favourite,” Written by Deborah Davis and Tony McNamara.

Screenplay (Adapted): “Can You Ever Forgive Me?” Screenplay by Nicole Holofcener and Jeff Whitty.

Visual Effects: “First Man,” Paul Lambert, Ian Hunter, Tristan Myles, J.D. Schwalm

Sound Mixing: “Roma,” Skip Lievsay, Craig Henighan and Jose Antonio Garcia

Sound Editing: “A Quiet Place,” Ethan Van der Ryn and Erik Aadahl

Music (Original Song): “Shallow” from “A Star Is Born,” Music and Lyric by Lady Gaga, Mark Ronson, Anthony Rossomando and Andrew Wyatt

Music (Original Score): “If Beale Street Could Talk,” Nicholas Britell

Makeup and Hairstyling: “Vice,” Greg Cannom, Kate Briscoe and Patricia Dehaney

Roma.jpg

Foreign Language Film: “Roma,” Mexico; Alfonso Curaon

Film Editing: “Bohemian Rhapsody,” John Ottman

Documentary: “Free Solo,” Elizabeth Chai Vasarhelyi, Jimmy Chin, Evan Hayes and Shannon Dill

Directing: “BlacKkKlansman,” Spike Lee

Costume Design: “Mary Queen of Scots,” Alexandra Byrne

Cinematography: “Cold War,” Lukasz Zal

Animated Feature Film: “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse”

Actress in a Supporting Role: Regina King, “If Beale Street Could Talk”

Blackkklansman.png

Actor in a Supporting Role: Mahershala Ali, “Green Book”

Actress in a Leading Role: Glenn Close, “The Wife”

Actor in a Leading Role: Rami Malek, “Bohemian Rhapsody”

Best Picture: “BlacKkKlansman,” Sean McKittrick, Jason Blum, Raymond Mansfield, Jordan Peele and Spike Lee

Phoenix Film Society Member's Top Five Movies of 2018

PFS.png

The Phoenix Film Society Member’s Top Five Movies of 2018

 

With Hollywood’s grandest night arriving on Sunday, Feb. 24, let’s recognize that the Phoenix Film Society had a big moment of their own on Jan. 30!

 

Before the PFS’s “Arctic” screening, the members in attendance voted for their favorite film of the year.   The Carney-Mitchell accounting firm monitored the procedures and tabulated the votes, and here are the Phoenix Film Society’s Top Five Movies of 2018:

 

Green Book.jpg

5. “Roma”

4. “The Wife”

3. “A Star Is Born”

2. “Bohemian Rhapsody”

1. “Green Book” 

Never Look Away - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

Never Look Away.jpg

‘Never Look Away’ compels us to keep watching

 

Written and directed by:  Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck’s

Starring:  Tom Schilling, Paula Beer, Sebastian Koch, Saskia Rosendahl, Oliver Masucci, and Evgeniy Sidikhin

 

“Never Look Away” – “Hardly anyone likes photos of themselves, but everyone’s supposed to like a painting.” – Kurt Barnert (Tom Schilling)

 

“Everything is connected.” – Elisabeth May (Saskia Rosendahl)

 

Writer/director Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck’s feature film “The Lives of Others” (2006) weaves such an absorbing, layered conflict into 1980s East Germany’s acknowledged intrusive culture so well, it topped Guillermo del Toro’s best film “Pan’s Labyrinth” (2006) that year and won the Best Foreign Language Film Oscar in 2007.  Yes, “The Lives of Others” is that good!

 

After Donnersmarck’s Johnny Depp/Angelia Jolie vehicle “The Tourist” (2010), “Never Look Away” is his third film.  The Academy recognized Donnersmarck’s second German movie with a Best Foreign Language Best Picture Oscar nomination, but due to its 188-minute runtime, “Never Look Away” does feel like a long commitment while sitting in your theatre seat.  Still, this movie does need time to breathe on-screen to eventually reveal its secrets and for the characters to reap enlightenment on their journeys.

 

Set in 1937 Dresden, 20-something Elisabeth takes her five-year-old nephew Kurt to a museum to experience and celebrate modern art, but a caustic tour guide attempts to sour their trip by bemoaning the various pieces as silly drivel created by faulty minds.  Quite frankly, the curators should apply more scrutiny when hiring their museum staff, but the somewhat-hostile chaperon fuels foreshadowing of the dark forces within the country.  “The Lives of Others” unmasks one series of German sins, but “Never Look Away” features two, the Nazi Party and the subsequent physical, cultural and political divides between East and West.  One particular character embodies the iniquity of both eras, and this individual propels the former’s sinister mindset into the latter’s clouded reality.

 

Kurt’s mindset, instead, is altruistic and with his aunt’s initial persuasion and his natural gifts, he eventually becomes an art student and meets Ellie (Paula Beer) who majors in fashion design.  These two kids start a romance that begins to follow Elisabeth’s decree. 

 

Donnersmarck’s film taps into a recipe that the Academy loves, as it wraps our protagonist in a loving romance and navigates it through several historical markers.  Additionally, “Never Look Away” will regularly surprise with unexpected detours through history, and it personalizes these stops with rich supporting characters who arrive and depart but leave lasting memoirs.  Russian Major Murawjow (Evgeniy Sidikhin) and Professor Antonius van Verten (Oliver Masucci) are just two examples.  Meanwhile, Max Richter’s beautiful score helps maintain continuity throughout the film, as one wonders how Elisabeth’s words of wisdom in the first act will carry through with Kurt to the end.  The story is loosely-based on painter Gerhard Richter, and his connection with Germany’s political split is a natural fit with Donnersmarck’s history as well.  

 

This particular critic caught the movie at the 2018 Toronto International Film Festival, but the picture’s thoughtful threads did not quite resonate to earn epic personal praises, however, upon a second viewing, Donnersmarck’s themes rang truer.  Do you need to watch “Never Look Away” twice?  No, but it took this moviegoer 6 hours and 16 minutes to fully appreciate the nuance of its messages.

(3.5/4 stars)

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

 

 

Happy Death Day 2U - Movie Review by Monte Yazzie

Death Day.jpg

Happy Death Day 2U

 

Director: Christopher Landon

Starring: Jessica Rothe, Israel Broussard, Phi Vu, Suraj Shurma, Sarah Yarkin, Rachel Matthews, and Ruby Modine

 

Take a moment and think of every great movie sequel you have ever seen. Now that you are done listing all the subpar sequels, how many are left on the list that are excellent? The craft of constructing a sequel is a difficult undertaking, especially if the first film is something special.

 

“Happy Death Day” was a surprise upon its release in 2017; a film that took the concept of the 1993 comedy “Groundhog Day” and turned it into a clever and unique horror film that delivered some really fun surprises. The turnaround for the sequel happened rather quickly, which is always a little concerning, but “Happy Death Day 2U” takes a route less travelled for movie sequels by twisting the narrative, including the genre, into something completely different.

 

Tree Gelbman (Jessica Rothe) lived the same day over and over, dying at the hands of a masked killer every day until she was able to solve her own murder. With the help of her boyfriend Carter (Israel Broussard), Tree thought she had escaped the time loop and could move on with her life. But things take a drastic reversal as a science experiment, conducted by Carter’s roommate Ryan (Phi Vu), creates another time jump that brings Tree back face-to-face with her baby-faced masked killer. But something’s changed, things are different this time.

 

Christopher Landon directed “Happy Death Day” with a clear understanding of tone for a horror film that offered a few frights, a creepy looking slasher, a charming hero, and some lighthearted humor. It felt like a PG-13 horror film from the 90’s mixed with the science fiction appeal of the 80’s. So, it’s not surprising that Mr. Landon brings the successful qualities back in different doses and combinations while making one interesting and tricky turn in the structure.

 

The narrative, which leaned strongly in the horror genre with only a sprinkling of sci-fi for the first film, flips into a straight forward science fiction film with a spattering of horror here and there. It’s a bold move that is somehow surprisingly pulled off. Utilizing a science fiction storytelling theme that feels reminiscent of “The Outer Limits”, “Happy Death Day 2U” refreshingly twists and morphs into a different film. While it still struggles with some shoddy dialog and unusual side character performances, like a wacky college professor who bumbles into the excitement at the worst time, the film still merges its quality elements in an enjoyable way.

 

A big part of why this film works so well is the exceptional screen appeal of Jessica Rothe who holds the film together with her tenacity and charisma. Ms. Rothe’s performance is convincing and entertaining throughout; whether she is wielding an axe or waking up with her hair frizzed from electricity, the actor entirely owns it.

 

“Happy Death Day 2U” works really well up to a point that it becomes slightly unhinged with its time looping dilemma and wanting to push for expanding its universe beyond the primary character’s life, but it doesn’t derail the fun that this movie is clearly trying to produce. Rarely do sequels work as well as it does with “Happy Death Day 2U”. Blumhouse Productions continues to surprise with their brand of genre films.

 

Monte’s Rating

 3.25 out of 5.00

 

 

Allita: Battle Angel - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

Alita.jpg

Alita: Battle Angel

 

Directed by Robert Rodriguez

Screenplay by James Cameron and Laeta Kalogridis

Based on “Gunnm” by Yukito Kishiro

Starring Rosa Salazar, Christoph Waltz, Jennifer Connelly, Mahershala Ali, Ed Skrien, Jackie Earle Haley, Keean Johnson

 

In this world of CGI dinosaurs, spectacular sequences filled with well-endowed, form-fitting spandex heroes leaping from rooftop to rooftop, it is easy to lose sight of when a truly special film comes before your eyes.

Robert Rodriguez’s “Alita: Battle Angel” is a spectacle from its dreary beginnings to its spectacular form-fit heroine leaping from rooftop to rooftop. The story, based on the Japanese manga series, “Gunnm” is yet another dystopic story in a future where Earth is devastated, the well-to-do people live in a great city in the sky, Zalem and the everyday denizens live on what’s left of our history.

What’s curious about this particular story, written by James Cameron and Laeta Kalogridis (“Alexander,” “Pathfinder,” “Shutter Island,” “Terminator Genisys”), is just how Alita (Rosa Salazar in her debut performance) comes across the screen. I’m not referring to the revolutionary motion capture systems used to create the character, though that is just as amazing. No, we actually get to see Ms. Salazar’s naiveté, her sense of wonder.

Found in a heap of junk by Dr. Dyson Ido (Christoph Waltz), a wunderkind himself, Alita is brought to life. We learn very quickly of the haves and have-nots in this society. We learn of Ido’s life, leading him to this moment and of his ex-wife, Chiren (Jennifer Connelly).

Peripherally, we learn of Vector (Mahershala Ali) and his power over the have-nots. Ed Skrien plays Zapan, probably the one character in the film that actually freaked me out while Jackie Earle Haley plays a thuggish cyborg named Grewishka. I came to liken Grewishka as the Energizer Bunny: he just kept coming and coming and coming.

But that’s the part of “Alita: Battle Angel” that I really admired. As thin as the story is, against the special effects and the effectiveness of the Dolby Cinema 3D presentation, the characters really stood out against their environment.

Don’t mistake me. There were elements that seemed hopelessly cheesy; namely the relationship between Alita and Hugo (Keean Johnson), the dashing John Travolta-type bad boy: we know he’s trouble. Yet, we don’t really care because we know of the inevitability of this type of character: as far in love as they get, we know it can’t work, but we care because Hugo is genuinely someone who is full of ideals and integrity, something the “bad boy” type isn’t usually imbued with. It was interesting to see Hugo interact with his own clique, especially Jorge Lendeborg, Jr, who has sprung up out of practically nowhere over the last year, first in “Love, Simon” and then the recent and popular “BumbleBee.”

The centerpiece of this whole affair is the “motorball” game, a la Norman Jewison’s “Rollerball”. The idea for this part of “Alita” is as much an homage as it is an inventive story device: it gives Alita her ‘character.’ Without the aggressiveness, Alita would be a passive individual. It strengthens her motives and her resolve.

The sideshow with Hugo and the ongoing, relentless bounty hunter chases really wears one down by the third act.  I admit that it was fun to see the dregs of the assassin pool in a Star Wars-cantina style bar, where Jeff Fahey and Rick Yune make appearances.

“Alita: Battle Angel” never relents. And that is part of its challenge. It is a cacophony of sight and sound. It shines a brilliant light on a heroine that people can genuinely cheer for. But, I don’t know if it has the substance that it thinks it does. My biggest disappointment is in Mahershala Ali’s Vector. He has a terrific screen presence, but his character is truly rendered as a puppet. Now that I say that, I could totally see him playing a future version of Mr. Anderson from “The Matrix,” but I digress.

Unlike “Avatar,” James Cameron created something that people can relate to, something of value to latch on. Robert Rodgriguez’s direction is assured through the technology behind the film. Just like a lot of his early films, Cameron is still experimenting. It’s showy and flashy, but it is reality.

Is it good? To an extent. It is overt in its intentions and subversive in its characters. Just like a traditional James Cameron film ought to be. There is feeling, depth and the characters are strong, but the story doesn’t completely hold up next to the amazing spectacle that the movie really is.

3 out of 4 stars

Arctic - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

Arctic.jpg

Mikkelsen carries the torch in ‘Arctic’

 

Directed by:  Joe Penna

Written by:  Joe Penna and Ryan Morrison

Starring:  Mads Mikkelsen

 

“Arctic” – Mads Mikkelsen’s character kneels on a narrow path of black rock and chips away at ice and snow with a pick and a serrated piece of sheet metal.  For anyone who has ever shoveled a driveway when the temperature hovers around zero, the opening scene of “Arctic” is a stressful reminder of Old Man Winter and his associated, compulsory chores. 

 

The difference between Overgard (Mikkelsen) and John Q. Public scrapping coagulated powder in the frozen suburbs of Minneapolis, Chicago, Buffalo, Toronto, Boston, and Spokane is the latter poor soul can – at least - catch reprieve inside a heated home stocked with hot chocolate.  Overgard, however, finds no such balmy comfort, but actually, a crashed carcass of an aircraft does serve as an indispensable refuge. 

 

He is the lone survivor of a plane crash and is now stranded in a freezing anti-wonderland with little hope of rescue, as the unforgiving elements bear down on his mortal self.

 

“By far, the toughest thing I’ve ever done in my life.  The conditions were overwhelming,” Mikkelsen said in a recent interview.

 

Overgard sports chapped lips and dry, pink cheeks that are burned from the frigid air, and when roaming outside the plane during daylight hours, he encases himself in a red down jacket, a gray hat and – what looks like – snowmobile pants as his only protection from the cold.  The nearby buttes do not exactly deflect the elements or provide shelter, and as he fishes in icy water, shovels into crusty ice (for a reason that will not be revealed in this review) and hand cranks a small transmitter in the hopes that someone will hear a faint ping, we can feel the cold seeping into our bones while sitting in comfortable theatre seats. 

 

Like “127 Hours” (2010) and “Cast Away” (2000), the harsh environment forces our solitary hero into resourceful ingenuity, but unlike those films, “Arctic” does not flashback to leisurely moments or capture stretches of screen time in urban civilization.  Here, the movie – which was filmed in Iceland - is always set on location, and it’s up to Mikkelsen to carry the torch throughout the picture. 

 

Whether he plays a Bond villain, an 18th century white knight or an elementary school teacher falsely accused of a heinous act, Mikkelsen always seems to deliver a sturdy, charismatic performance with his suave and articulate Northern European flair.  He commands the screen throughout the 97-minute picture in near-total isolation, and one Phoenix Film Society member mentioned just after a Scottsdale screening on Jan. 30, “Even though Mikkelsen speaks very few words, he communicates so much in silence during the entire movie.”

 

This is especially true during the last 60 minutes, as a very specific moral choice repeatedly confronts Overgard.  Meanwhile, the screenplay places nature’s obstacles in front of him that challenge his altruistic compass, as the director successfully performs a high wire act by introducing imposing theatrical impediments while not manipulating the audience.  

 

Hence, Penna – who is directing his first feature film – displays massive resourcefulness and imagination in the most punitive of settings, and when asked why he chose such a difficult shoot, he said, “To tell a story of resilience, it had to be in the Artic.” 

 

Overgard and Mikkelsen naturally fit with the surroundings.  Our fragile selves might not, but bring a down jacket, a hat, snowmobile pants, and a scarf too…and be awed. 

(3.5/4 stars)

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part - Movie Review by Monte Yazzie

The Lego Movie 2.jpg

The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part

 

Director: Mike Mitchell

Starring: Chris Pratt, Elizabeth Banks, Will Arnett, Tiffany Haddish, Stephanie Beatriz, Alison Brie, Nick Offerman, Charlie Day, and Maya Rudolph

 

Everything is NOT awesome with the happy residents of Bricksburg, especially the happy-go-lucky master builder Emmett who saved the toy-inspired universe in the standout hit from 2014. The masterminds, Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, behind the origin story for these toys-turned-movie characters return to write the script but new director Mike Mitchell takes over directing duties. This doesn’t matter too much because the formula hasn’t changed between the different Lego franchises.

 

Emmett (Chris Pratt) saved the city of Bricksburg from President Business and just before they could celebrate their victory, a cutesy alien Lego society descended from the sky and turned the bright shining world into a dystopian, Mad Max-esque wasteland. The aliens destroy everything that has and will be made, leaving the citizens of Bricksburg to live in fear of building anything new or shiny. Things get worse when all the great warriors and leaders are kidnapped; Lucy (Elizabeth Banks), Batman (Will Arnett), Benny (Charlie Day), Unikitty (Alison Brie), and Metalbeard (Nick Offerman) are all captured leaving Emmett to venture into the unknown after them.

 

Much of the appeal and charm for these Lego films has come from the use of humor and the inclusion of pop culture referencing throughout nearly every frame of the film. Where else are going to find “Jurassic Park” velociraptors, every member of the Justice League from DC Comics, and John McClane from “Die Hard” in the same movie, sometimes at the same time? The fact that these sometimes subtle, mostly blatant nods to pop culture come off so delightfully is quite impressive.

 

Helping make these interesting crossovers come to life are the exceptional voice actors. Firstly, Will Arnett’s low baritone Batman steals the show, it’s easy to see why this character received a spinoff feature. Tiffany Haddish plays the morphing evil alien queen wreaking havoc on the Lego universe. Ms. Haddish has such a unique cadence and rhythm in her dialog, it’s easy to laugh and smile even when a joke isn’t  being pushed into the narrative. Unfortunately, the two leads, Emmett and Lucy, have a narrative that is stifled by poor character development and a strange over saturation of Chris Pratt’s vocal work. The second act of the film is consumed by Emmett and Rex Dangervest, a new character who embraces the solitude life of a hero on a spaceship run by dinosaurs. These two characters are voiced by Mr. Pratt but the storyline for why they  come together brings the pacing of the film to a halt in an effort to add some kind of mystery that is building towards the inevitable ending, which surprisingly accomplishes  enough with the other characters throughout to remain a kindhearted message.

 

“The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part” isn’t as awesome as the first installment, but that doesn’t mean that it’s not good. Underneath the story of an alien invasion, forced wedding nuptials, and catchy songs that ruin your mind, there is a story about brothers and sisters, being kind to one another, and accepting childhood for as long as possible. It’s a sweet sentiment when the film transitions into the “real” world and not the Lego world. So, while everything may NOT be awesome, this film still has all the workings of a good family film worth the trip to the movies.

 

Monte’s Rating

3.50 out of 5.00

Cold Pursuit - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

Cold Pursuit.jpg

Cold Pursuit

 

Directed by Hans Petter Moland

Written by Frank Baldwin

Based on “In Order of Disappearance” by Kim Fupz Aakeson

Starring Liam Neeson, Tom Bateman, Tom Jackson, Emmy Rossum, Domenick Lombardozzi, Laura Dern, William Forsythe

 

Revenge is a very dirty business.

But, when done appropriately and privately, and with dry humor intact, well, the grit and gristle of revenge isn’t as distasteful.

Take Nels Coxman (Liam Neeson). He’s a genuinely nice guy. A family man who, as attested to by his Citizen of the Year award is shook to his very core when his son, a baggage handler at the local airport turns up dead from a heroin overdose.

Based on the 2014 foreign language picture from director Hans Petter Moland, “In Order of Disappearance,” this film derives its guts from the dark and dry humor that permeated “Fargo” in 1996. As in that film, a quiet town disrupted by a violent act, which turns into a series of violent pratfalls as the local gangster, Trevor “Viking” Calcote (Tom Bateman) realizes something is amiss when members of his crew start disappearing.

When we’re laughing at the lunacy that is Bateman’s snarmy character, decked out in his ultramodern mountain villa and his Tesla Model X, we take delight in the unassuming ways in which Nels dispatches his victims. All of it is senseless and Baldwin’s screenplay doesn’t make any bones about that; we’re just along for the ride.

Adding to the Coen-esque nature of the film is the gung-ho deputy, Kim Dash (Emmy Rossum). The character is aware that something sinister is happening around her, but her partner Gip (John Doman) encourages her to back down, to enjoy the serenity of the Rocky Mountain community.

Coxman’s antics stir up two hornets’ nests. The first is a bloody gang war between Viking and an American Indian drug cartel. Moland and Baldwin extrude some fine detail about a part of history that not many are aware of. The second nest is on the home front. Grace (Laura Dern) is genuinely struggling over the death of their son, leaving her to grieve alone.

The art direction becomes as much a character as the talent that inhabits the screen. From the warmth of the Coxman home, a log home meant to symbolize a bit of normalcy, to ground Nels as compared to the austere look and feel of the aforementioned sleek and ultramodern home that Viking inhabits. The look here gives a squeaky clean image to the violence that Viking has wrought.

I mentioned “Fargo” as an influence for this movie, but I would be remiss if I didn’t mention “The Substitute” with Tom Berenger and, not unintentionally, William Forsythe, who plays a former crew member of Viking’s is a “middleman,” providing information to interested parties is just as humorous as the rest of the film. His wife, Ahn (Elizabeth Thai) was an absolute delight in the middle of the chaos.

I saw the film before Mr. Neeson’s interview broke. Though it explores themes of racism, his character is most certainly not. In fact, it goes out of its way to ensure that where that theme could go awry, it steers itself back on course.

Though it would probably have done better in the 1990’s, “Cold Pursuit” is timeless tail of family and revenge.

3 out of 4

The Idea of Manhood - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

Idea of Manhood poster.jpg

The Idea of Manhood

 

Directed by Serge Kushnier

Written by Serge Kushnier

Starring Jeremy Kushnier, Karl Bury, Thomas Sullivan, Meg, McCrossen, Elizabeth Masucci, Melanie Merkosky

 

“Life finds a way.” Leave it me to find a way to tie a deeply moving, life-altering buddy dramaedy into one of the most oft repeated lines from a movie that is turning 25 this year. God, I feel old.

But, you know what? Serge Kushnier’s “The Idea of Manhood” reminded me that it is okay to question our choices, to make a right turn when a left turn might be the right thing to do. Still with me?

Good!

Kushnier’s award-winning dramaedy features two college buddies chumming it up one weekend; Jacob, a married man whose wife and kids just happen to be up north for the summer at camp is a bachelor, footloose and fancy-free in his Brooklyn Brownstone when his buddy, Sandy shows up unexpectedly. Their reunion is a bit awkward at first, as Jacob tries to pry out of Sandy why he’s suddenly on his doorstep.

Idea of Manhood PFF.jpg

There is a simplicity in Kushnier’s approach to his script, to the staging of his characters and their environs. As he related to us at the Phoenix Film Festival, he shot the film in the NYC area over a nine-day period. The simplicity pays off as the script slowly builds to its thunderous crescendo as two friends, who seemingly had drifted apart find one another in a moment of . . . well . . . manhood.

Jeremy Kushnier is sublime as Jacob, a man who we can tell at the beginning of the film is just exhausted. We don’t necessarily know why, but the idea of a sorely needed bachelor’s weekend is slowly worked into our vantage point by actor and director Kushnier, respectively. Kushnier plays low key throughout the course of the story as he is suddenly put on the spot to entertain Sandy.

Karl Bury gives one of the most emotionally-driven performances I’ve seen this year. Through the early phases of the film, Sandy is very awkward, trying to grab attention from Jacob. Yet, nothing he shares with Jacob is surprising, given the state of affairs in this country. It is only when Sandy is introduced to people in Jacob’s life, outside of Jacob’s family, that we start to see Sandy finally peel himself out of his shell, creating a really nice twist on what would seem another downtrodden character.

Before I touch on that twist, there’s a moment where Jacob is entertaining his friends, bringing Sandy in to his personal environment. Jacob states that he enjoys hanging out with people younger than he is. As such, his guests spend most of their time on their cell phones, leaving an uncomfortable silence. Sandy suggests Beer Pong, which they all agree to, and in the middle of a match, Sandy recites a story, which at first will sound familiar, but the way its told, the audience will think twice about it (I know I did) and when he’s finally done reciting the story, the reactions of the guests is priceless.

It is this afternoon’s activities that cause a monumental shift in the way the characters are perceived. The way Kushnier builds the story, the way select scenes are staged and shot by DP John L. Murphy, you know that something is brewing and the reveal is finally delivered. There’s a sense of relief and calm, that all is right in the world. Yet, there’s an air of mystery still left when all is said and done,

Writer/Director Serge Kushnier

Writer/Director Serge Kushnier

And, that’s the beauty of Serge Kushnier’s story. It’s a simply executed story full of witty and dramatic dialog, allowing Jeremy and Karl to deliver two of the most complex and diverse characters I’ve seen in independent cinema since “Black” reconnected with Kevin in “Moonlight”. That’s the level of craftsmanship that Jeremy Kushnier and Karl Bury brought to their characters:  we have little pieces of a puzzle to put together both men’s lives, and yet, when the story is over, the script is flipped and you’re left with a desire to know more. Subtly though, you really don’t need anymore. As I said at the beginning life does indeed find a way through all the chaos.

So too does Serge Kushnier. And brilliantly so.

4 out of 4 stars

Miss Bala - Movie Review by Monte Yazzie

Miss Bala.jpg

Miss Bala

 

Director: Catherine Hardwicke

Starring: Gina Rodriguez, Ismael Cruz Cordova, Matt Lauria, Aislinn Derbez, Cristina Rodlo, Ricardo Abarca, and Anthony Mackie

 

Explosions and bullets blaze around the silhouette of a lone female wearing a beauty pageant dress and holding an assault rifle. Bodies flee the mayhem, bodies fall to the ground, but a changed woman marches forward with survival and the promise of freedom motivating her every step. It’s a wonderful sight to see. 

 

“Miss Bala”, a remake of the 2011 film that was also Mexico’s submission for the Academy Award’s Best Foreign Language Film category, is offered a frenzied Americanized update starring Gina Rodriguez. The film, directed by the talented Catherine Hardwicke, doesn’t stray too far from the original premise but adds a great performance from the cool and clever Gina Rodriguez and supporting tough guy gangster Ismael Cruz Cordova. 

 

Gloria (Gina Rodriguez) is a makeup artist working in Los Angeles. Her childhood friend Suzu (Cristina Rodlo) lives in Tijuana and is planning on competing in the Miss Baja beauty pageant. Gloria is coming to support her friend and help with her makeup. Before the pageant, Gloria and Suzu head out for a night on the town when a group of armed drug cartel members comes to assassinate a political figure at the club they are at. During the chaos the two friends are separated, Gloria tries to find her friend but comes face to face with Lino (Ismael Cruz Cordova), the leader of the drug organization.

 

The narrative in “Miss Bala” pushes an aspect of empowerment throughout, Gina Rodriguez does a nice job of displaying the transition of Gloria’s trauma and helplessness to ultimate resolve and revenge. Still, there is something missing, or lost, in the composition of this updated version of the film. The analysis of the socioeconomic environment in Mexico, the honest citizens forced into fear-induced captivity, and the corruption that makes trust an unreliable commodity are only touched upon in this version; the focus is clearly aimed at the inevitable action sequences and the empowerment of one intelligent woman’s demand to survive. The empowerment angle is actually very well-conceived throughout the film. 

 

Gina Rodriguez accomplishes the transformation into a confident and shrewd hero nicely. However, she is also assisted by an interesting performance from Ismael Cruz Cordova who composes the villain Lino with a subtle hint of chivalrous merit that is ultimately smeared by a life lived by using fear as a weapon. When the dynamic between the two is utilized effectively, “Miss Bala” shines as a character piece driven by the natural cat-and-mouse dynamic of motivations between the abductor and the abducted. In one of the better scenes Lino takes Gloria to a small village he grew up in, they share a meal and Lino talks about his past while Gloria figures out her exit plan. 

 

Director Catherine Hardwicke is a very capable director hampered here by a script that is looking for mass appeal in the action-thriller genre. The performances will keep your attention and the occasional action scene will fulfill the need to watch a likable character find her comeuppance, however, these moments are fleeting in a film that just doesn’t commit to being more than a familiar tale we’ve seen many times already. Still, the image of a brave woman owning her femininity and staring down danger is a welcome sight on the silver screen.

 

Monte’s Rating

2.75 out of 4.00

They Shall Not Grow Old - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

The Shall Not Grow Old.jpg

They Shall Not Grow Old

 

Directed by Peter Jackson

 

“They shall not grow old, as we that are left grow old.”

~ From “For the Fallen” by Laurence Binyon

To be able to peer through a looking glass, to see the past as it was while presenting stories that modern audiences might not have ever seen, is an amazing idea. Peter Jackson, who may be more familiar to audiences for his ground breaking work on “The Lord of the Rings” and “The Hobbit” trilogies now brings us an exemplary look at World War I with his 3D documentary, “They Shall Not Grow Old.”

Culled from over 600 hours of interviews from the BCC and the IWM as well as 100 hours of original film, Jackson immerses his audience in experiences rather than a traditional narrative guiding an audience through the story. This allows Jackson to tell a narrative of the innocence of young, brave men who wanted to see action.  There was a sense of pride, especially from the men who were younger than the draft age.

There was a sense of community as well. For the voiceovers, Jackson used the recorded interviews of those who were present at this point in history. Many of the recollections painted a picture of defiance when parents would try to hold their children back: “I want to serve!” they claimed. And when they presented themselves to join, the military staff even tried to turn them away. Alas, they needed all the young, able-bodied men they could get their hands on.

Innocence rules the day as these men start their training as the military machine pushed these eager beavers to their limits and beyond. Once, trained, they are marshalled off to the battlefields of France where the German military was entrenched. It is here where Jackson switches from a series of still photos to a re-creation of the experiences on the battlefield with the continued interviews as narration.

The mood of the film changes, but the esprit de corps remains. There’s a lot of laughter and fond remembrances as the men settle in to squalid conditions, sharing stories of their memories of the events. The combination of the sound design, the visuals and the interviews really serve to put you in the middle of the action, to immerse you in their experience, something you’re unlikely to see elsewhere.

Of the many aspects of the film that I liked, the fact that we are not force-fed locations or dates; we are allowed to share in this experience as it unfolds for us, as it would have for these men, who simply followed orders. In this regard, it is rather a haunting experience, seeing events that I had only read about as a kid.

Innocence is a theme as the soldiers repatriate. They find that their own sacrifice is met with distaste. War changes not only those who serve, but those who stay behind as well because the involvement is one-sided; those who stay behind get their updates from the news and think that the experiences of the men coming home, of those who survived can’t be used in day to day work activities. It was a sobering reality that thankfully, didn’t repeat itself during World War II as much because everyone was involved.

“They Shall Not Grow Old” is a history lesson come to life. It isn’t clouded by either side’s reasoning for battling one another. It is a tale in morality and of sacrifice, something the world needs a good dose of today. The technical achievement alone is worthy of your time.

After a series of successful screening events over the last two months, They Shall Not Grow Old opens in theatres on Friday, February 1st.

 

3.75 out of 4

Serenity - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

Serenity.jpg

‘Serenity’ triggers agitation, frustration and exasperation

 

 

Written and directed by:  Steven Knight

Starring:  Matthew McConaughey, Anne Hathaway, Djimon Hounsou, Jason Clarke, and Diane Lane

 

 

“Serenity” – Baker Dill (Matthew McConaughey) drinks from a World’s Greatest Dad coffee mug, but he might not be the best at anything.  World’s Greatest Screwup, perhaps.  He’s a fisherman on Plymouth Island, a magical blue and sandy oasis where wealthy tourists descend for a week or two of R&R, but locals need to scrape and herd random sources of cash to keep roofs over their heads.  Baker may be the most desperate, but he is his own worst enemy. 

 

As the film opens, his friend Duke (Djimon Hounsou) and he take two vacationing-guys on a fishing trip, however, Baker pulls a knife on them in an erratic rage, and poof, his 700 hundred dollar-boating fee-bounty gets away in a sea of hurt feelings. 

 

Speaking of feelings, according to Google, the definition of serenity is the state of being calm, peaceful and untroubled, and Baker is anything but.  After sitting through writer/director Steven Knight’s torturous nonsense of a movie, tranquility could be the furthest emotion that you feel as well.  How about agitation, frustration and exasperation?

 

At the center of this mess is McConaughey, one of the most cinematically-schizophrenic actors working today.  When he dives into the right movies - like “U-571” (2000), “Killer Joe” (2011), “Mud” (2012), “Dallas Buyer’s Club” (2013), and “Interstellar” (2014) – he carries them with a sly bravado and comfortably commands our journey into (and through) big screen hazards. 

 

Lately, he has tripped with “Gold” (2016), “The Dark Tower” (2017) and those car commercials with bizarre soliloquies that prompt double takes or head scratches rather than inspiration. 

 

Here, McConaughey speaks to himself and others, as if he is sitting in one of those Lincolns but seemingly semi-crazed via cocaine or Red Bull while verbalizing with his trademark slow drawl, sporting two days of beard growth and gnarled hair, and soaking in beads of sweat. 

 

As Baker obsessively attempts to catch his white whale in the shape of a humongous tuna who always seems to snap his line, he struggles with his past, including a separation from his son, and this toxic combination fuels his circular existence of bad moods and financial jeopardy.  Thankfully, Constance (Diane Lane) regularly pays him for sex, so he garners enough gasoline-dough for his boat to catch Charlie the Tuna’s obese grandson.  Well, that’s a relief. 

 

Baker’s ex-wife Karen (Anne Hathaway) breaks up his monotony - by showing up out of nowhere – and asks him to kill her current husband Frank (Jason Clarke) for 10 million bucks. 

 

Hey, that score could buy 3.6 million gallons of gas!

 

In-between erratic camera movements, cartoonish supporting characters and a serious moral choice, Baker embarks on a voyage of self-discovery. While coping with his probable borderline personality disorder, he swims naked, sees an apparition, meets a persistent salesman in a black suit, and acts out in two scenes that channel Tommy Wiseau’s Johnny from the cult classic “The Room” (2003). 

 

No, “Serenity” does not make a whole lot of sense until the third act, but only through clumsy and preposterous explanations.  On the bright side, we see Hathaway with blonde hair, and a remake of “The Room” seems possible.  The movie was also filmed on the island of Mauritius, just east of Madagascar, so at least the cast enjoyed a nice vacation.  For movie audiences?  Watching “Serenity” is work, and getting through it should earn you a World’s Most Patient Moviegoer mug.  It’s not worth it though, not even for 3.6 million gallons of gas.

(1/4 stars)

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

Cold War - Movie Review by Jeff Mitchell

Cold War.jpg

Pawlikowski’s ‘Cold War’ is a dreamy encounter and 2018’s best film

 

Directed by:  Pawel Pawlikowski

Written by:  Pawel Pawlikowski, Janusz Glowacki and Piotr Borkowski

Starring:  Joanna Kulig and Tomasz Kot

 

“Cold War”  – The Cold War lasted from the late 1940s to 1991, and Berlin was a metropolitan petri dish that unmistakably demonstrated the stark rift between East and West.  Recent notable films like “Good Bye, Lenin!” (2003), “The Lives of Others” (2006), “The Debt” (2010), and “Bridge of Spies” (2015) feature this schizophrenic German city, as an integral character of their narratives, one that physically separates democracy from communism.  Although each of the previously-mentioned films features a love interest, none of those movies are love stories. 

 

Far from it, but writer/director Pawel Pawlikowski’s picture is.  Berlin is not the centerpiece of “Cold War”, but the movie’s most pivotal moment occurs there, as the urban-poster child of political and cultural division becomes wholly symbolic of nearly every significant rift within Pawlikowski’s film, with two exceptions.  First, the underlying passion between the leads Wiktor (Tomasz Kot) and Zula (Joanna Kulig).  Second, the song, “Two Hearts, Four Eyes”, which appears in various forms throughout the picture, but one can also effectively argue that the track itself reflects the aforementioned divisions.    

 

In the most beautifully-shot movie of 2018, “Cold War” showcases a fervent love affair between a music director (Kot) and a singer/dancer (Kulig) that carries markedly more endurance than a typical June to August fling.  Wiktor and Zula meet in 1949 Poland, but summer is a forgotten memory.  Crossing the country in a van during the dead of winter, Wiktor, Irena (Agata Kulesza) and Kaczmarek (Borys Szyc) look for singers to perform in a traditional Polish music production.  Their company eventually camps at a rural “stately home”, but the snow has somewhat melted to uncover thick cakes of mud.  Several aspiring performers audition, and Zula and another young woman sing together.  Although our blonde-haired heroine is not as talented as the other, Wiktor says, “(She) has something.  Energy.  Spirit.  She’s original.”

 

Sometime afterwards, the two begin a romance, and although their deep infatuation burns, Wiktor and Zula do not function – or communicate with each other - terribly well through the procedural, mundane grinds of a relationship. 

 

For instance, Wiktor asks, “Tie or no tie,” to Zula before a party, and she responds, “Tie,” but he does not wear it to the event.  It goes both ways, as Wiktor assures her that she has no reason to be jealous of his old girlfriend (Jeanne Balibar), but that does not stop Zula from letting an invented resentment ruin her evening. 

 

Wiktor is older and even keel but naive, and Zula is the object of most men’s eyes, flutters at the attention but can strike or feel despondent when dealt an injustice or a perceived one.  (Zula actually signals her feelings through dance - as an organic barometer - both on and off-stage.)  The two don’t logically fit together, but when Wiktor and Zula dominate screen time, while enveloped by rich, vibrant baths of crystal clear and misty cinematic black and white, Pawlikowski compels his audience to hope for a continuous union.  His intention is justifiable, because his parents inspired the characters of Wiktor and Zula, which are their names as well.  In an Aug. 2018 interview, Pawlikowski said that the mechanics of his parents’ relationship exist with Wiktor and Zula on-screen, but their real-life story arcs do not. 

 

He laughed, “The realist version would be really boring.”

 

Not “Cold War”.  Pawlikowski’s film is a dreamy encounter of floating episodic vignettes that feel otherworldly, like floating in a welcoming sea of chocolate fondue.  As Wiktor and Zula dip into fateful decisions on both sides of the Iron Curtain – that reflect distinctive music, dances, moods, and politics – they slip into temporary self-destructions or potent bonds over 88 entrancing minutes and sew a common thread over an infamous 20th century divide.

(4/4 stars)

 

Jeff – a member of the Phoenix Critics Circle – has penned film reviews since 2008 and graduated from ASU’s Walter Cronkite School of Journalism.  Follow Jeff and the Phoenix Film Festival on Twitter @MitchFilmCritic and @PhoenixFilmFest, respectively.

 

Glass - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

Glass.jpg

Glass

 

Directed by M. Night Shyamalan

Written by M. Night Shyamalan

Starring James McAvoy, Bruce Willis, Anya Taylor – Joy, Sarah Paulson, Samuel L. Jackson

 

I don’t mind sequels.

Really, I don’t. I grew up with them. In fact if the world wasn’t being decimated by bureaucratic fools and their super computers, I was watching the continued adventures of the Starship Enterprise, the swashbuckling heroism that is Han Solo and Luke Skywalker or the exploits and adventures of Indiana Jones.

Heck, even Norman Bates got a sequel. Several sequels!

Are you detecting a theme here?

M. Night Shyamalan is no exception here. His 1999 film, “The Sixth Sense” raised audience awareness of his unique storytelling abilities with his character-driven narratives. (“I see dead people” still haunts me to this day and I didn’t even see it in a theater.) As with the characters I previously mentioned, Shyamalan understands how to create tension effectively, and in 2000, he introduced us to David Dunn (Bruce Willis) and Elijah Price (Samuel L. Jackson), two people who pitted against one another in a comic book infused story.

The film was a modest success, and for fifteen years, the world that Shyamalan created stood still until “Split” came along, introducing us to Kevin Wendell Crumb (James McAvoy), who with his 23 distinct personalities held several teenaged girls hostage. At the end of that film (spoiler alert), David Dunn’s character make an appearance when Kevin’s 24th personality, “The Horde” breaks out of the Philadelphia Zoo.

“Glass” picks up three weeks after “Split” and sees David Dunn searching for The Horide. Visually, Shyamalan created a riveting first act. The tension and excitement that coated “Split” is present in “Glass” as Dunn plays the vigilante, something Bruce Willis does very well.

When they are eventually captured and remanded to a psychiatric ward for observation the story loses its steam and its drive. This story’s antagonist, Mr. Glass doesn’t have the same threatening characteristics as Kevin and his personalities and by the time we get to this film, Kevin’s personalities lose their luster.

Part of the challenge is Sarah Paulson’s Dr. Ellie Staple.  As a psychiatrist, she tries to convince the three men that they suffer from delusions of grandeur and that she can help them overcome these thoughts of being superheroes, which is easily contradicted by Joseph Dunn (Spencer Treat Clark, “Unbreakable,” “Gladiator”) who believes his father’s abilities and a real-life super hero.

We ultimately learn the true motives behind the trio’s captivity, which plays as a poorly transitioned twist as it builds on another twist which then turns into a curveball. I got the sense that when we get to the third act that Shyamalan was indeed trying to wrap things up, but he felt compelled for some reason to shoehorn in yet another idea to the point where it just became ludicrous.

Ultimately, the finale suffers under the strain of all the twists. At its core, “Glass” has strong characters and motives, even if their individual purposes got muddled.

1 out of 4

Destroyer - Movie Review by Ben Cahlamer

Destroyer.jpg

Destroyer

 

Directed by Karyn Kusama

Written by Phil Hay and Matt Manfredi

Starring Nicole Kidman, Sebastian Stan, Toby Kebbell, Tatiana Maslany, Bradley Whitford, Jade Pettyjohn, Scoot McNairy

 

I’ve striven very hard over the past year to avoid most details about projects, which is why Karyn Kusama’s “Destroyer” took me by surprise. While my goal is to know as few details as possible, so that I am not influenced by the film’s marketing, my awareness of this project was paltry, which is a shame because Ms. Kusama has a keen eye for details, something this film is full of.

“Destroyer” is the story of a burnt out detective on the trail of a murderer, as her past collides with her present. The detective, Erin Bell (Nicole Kidman) is so far over the edge that she shouldn’t be on the streets. Yet, she knows how to get the job done. The film opens on a dry Los Angeles river viaduct, a slain body and a dye pack-stained $100 bill are the only pieces of evidence that Bell, and we have to go on over the next two hours.

Kusama’s style shifts from the present to the past, building Erin’s story up to the present time. We sense that the character fears something, but we’re not given enough details to know exactly what. This is the film’s strength and its Achilles Heel: the film relies on each detail being layered on one another to move the time-shifting story forward. Within the details are several strong characters, but they never really rise above the story, which was a disappointment.

Erin’s partner, Chris (Sebastian Stan) is familiar to the gang that the duo eventually infiltrate. Together, they become almost chameleon like, blending into their surroundings. Their target is Silas (Toby Kebbell), a violent man with no morals and zero remorse. His girlfriend Petra (Tatiana Maslany) is more than window dressing in this story, which I appreciated.

As the story progresses, we meet the other members of the team as Erin interrogates them trying to hunt down Silas in the modern timeframe. The difficulty with these characters is that they are reduced to chess pieces; as the story doesn’t care about the past as much as it does to solving Erin’s story, each beat less compelling than the last.

The strength of this film is solely in Nicole Kidman’s performance, a fact that she was nominated for a Golden Globe. We see her desperation through the makeup, her relentlessness and the abuse that she takes for past sins. She reminded me of Al Pacino’s Vincent Hannah; always on the edge. The supporting characters should have boosted her performance and in a way they do, but the story forces the secondary characters in to the background along with her character being too far over the edge.

I very much wanted to like this film. Kidman’s performance is absolutely first rate. The story is strong, but the film suffers from showing too much while not giving the audience enough time to take the story in.

2.5 out of 4